View Single Post
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 15th June 2006, 05:51 PM
boggiemanx boggiemanx is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: carlow town
Posts: 79
Default reply

warning do not go with clearewire broadband if u have more than 2 connections, example a pc and a xbox.(this test was with 1 connection only) as there signal is crap. iv reported them to the broadband board. they are advertising 1mb,2,mb,3mb and for all those connection speeds they only give 500kb-1.5mb, they are robbing people, i have rang them many times and never got replys,and no email replys. i spoke to a tech head and complained about speed, and he told me this,if ur paying for a 3mb package ull get 2mb or less speed, if ur paying for a 2mb package ull get 1mb+ or less, if ur paying for a 1mb package ull never see 1mb only 500kb- or 275kb. now they advertise these packages on there site they should now rename them to random broadband. because this is fraud....advise pay the disconnetion fee and go with some1 else. i know wireless is good but its random.

heres my speed test and i get the 2mb package. and im in carlow and they told me that carlow has the best connection in the country...ha ha ha. idiots allday yesterday i got only 200+kb


15/06/2006 17:47 1648 kbps (206 KB/s) 259 kbps (33 KB/s) 81 % 49 ms 109 ms
15/06/2006 17:46 1904 kbps (238 KB/s) 273 kbps (35 KB/s) 74 % 47 ms 114 ms
15/06/2006 17:46 1508 kbps (189 KB/s) 356 kbps (45 KB/s) 57 % 48 ms 267 ms
15/06/2006 17:36 2214 kbps (277 KB/s) 267 kbps (34 KB/s) 89 % 50 ms 97 ms
15/06/2006 17:32 1975 kbps (247 KB/s) 57440 kbps (7180 KB/s) 85 % 72 ms 78 ms
15/06/2006 17:29 2243 kbps (281 KB/s) 55882 kbps (6986 KB/s) 91 % 48 ms 91 ms
15/06/2006 003 368 kbps (46 KB/s) 326 kbps (41 KB/s) 49 % 63 ms 313 ms
14/06/2006 21:52 299 kbps (38 KB/s) 310 kbps (39 KB/s) 51 % 71 ms 410 ms
14/06/2006 21:32 1281 kbps (161 KB/s) 232 kbps (29 KB/s) 58 % 50 ms 216 ms
14/06/2006 214 528 kbps (66 KB/s) 343 kbps (43 KB/s) 71 % 71 ms 259 ms
Total Averages:
1397 kbps (175 KB/s) 11569kbps (1447KB/s) 71 % 57 ms 196 ms
Reply With Quote