View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 3rd October 2006, 04:27 PM
cookie cookie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blacknight View Post
I don't see how Eircom could have warned Smart's clients. They'd have had not right to contact them
If you're paying line rental to eircom even if it's a secondary company like smart collecting the fee then Eircom should have warned people that smart telecom were putting their phone lines at risk. It's still a disgrace. Yes i agree that smart should have alerted customers but so should eircom. If the line was faulty you'd have to contact eircom ergo eircom do have some responsibilty to customers in warning them of what was going to happen due to smarts inability to pay the bills.
Reply With Quote
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42