Irish ISP Test - Broadband Forum - How Fast Is Your Connection?
Check your speed!
 

Welcome to the Irish ISP Test - Broadband Forum - How Fast Is Your Connection? forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   Irish ISP Test - Broadband Forum - How Fast Is Your Connection? > Lounge > General Chat

General Chat Talk about any topic you like

   

View Poll Results: Which Anti-Virus Do You Use?
McAfee 41 12.17%
Norton 59 17.51%
AVG 139 41.25%
F-Prot 2 0.59%
Trend Micro 7 2.08%
Other 89 26.41%
Voters: 337. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2008, 02:27 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3
Default

i use NORTON and AVG. they are both good and really essential for every net user..i trust the 2 anti-virus the most because i have been using them for years..im sure there are other anti-virus that are also good.
Reply With Quote
  #122 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2008, 11:50 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1
Default

Thats crazy why would you pay for norton and use AVG which does a good job. Especially with all the bad reviews norton gets. I use AVG, Spybot and adaware
Reply With Quote
  #123 (permalink)  
Old 20th August 2008, 11:25 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 4
Send a message via MSN to notech
Default

Norton is a well known Resource Hog and you should remove it IMHO.
If you want to use a paid product,, i'd Recommend Nod32.. I've been using it for years after a bad experience with Norton. ( which doesn't make me biased by the way! )
If you want a free product,, then run with the best free one,, AVG..

tec..

Last edited by notech; 20th August 2008 at 11:27 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #124 (permalink)  
Old 21st August 2008, 10:29 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Co. Donegal
Posts: 81
Default

My preferred virus checker for my home PC is NOD32. It is very lightweight and has very little impact on software performance, especially launching applications. The performance feels much like as if there is no virus checker installed. For example, Thunderbird (with several large mailboxes) loads in about 7 seconds on my old AMD XP3000+ PC compared to 11 seconds with Avast and 14 seconds from what I recall with AVG. It can be easily disabled to speed up transfer rates when copying a large number of files, especially executables and installers. The catch however is the cost, ~€80 for 3 years for a 1 PC home user license. For those who have an older PC and plenty of RAM, but would like to give their PC another performance boost, I would suggest trying NOD32, at least the 30 day trial version.

For those who want a free virus checker, but have a fairly old system and can’t afford to upgrade the PC, Avast seems to be a little less resource hungry than AVG from my experience. Applications load a little quicker with it than AVG, at least the system’s I’ve tried it on. This virus checker likes to talk each time it applies an update or whenever it encounters an infection (reminds me of Lexmark’s printing software), however, this can be turned off. This virus checker requires annual registration, however, while there is no charge for it, it can be a bit of a hassle installing it on someone else’s PC. While Avast does lack AVG’s link scanner, the Firefox browser makes a good alternative which does a similar job and warns the user before entering a rogue or malware infected website.

Finally, for those who have a good fast system or who prefer Internet Explorer and are interested in being warned about which links are dangerous when returned in search engine results or manually entered, AVG seems to work very well for this. I also typically recommend installing AVG to those who are just learning to go online or those with children. Another thing I like about AVG is that it does not require registration, making it quick to install. Just watch out for the program download size, as it can take around 10 minutes to download on a 1Mb connection. One drawback with the AVG home edition is that it does not include anti-Rootkit protection, unlike Avast and NOD32. For those wondering if the AVG Toolbar is required to scan links, from my experience, AVG still shows which links are safe in search results even if the AVG Toolbar is not installed.

For an infection clean-up, my preferred tool is Spybot Search & Destroy. It works best when run in the Windows safe mode. Its scanning speed varies a lot depending on the performance of a PC, varying between 15 minutes to over an hour from my experience (using version 1.6). For more advanced users who are familiar with start up processes and know how to check what start-up processes and applications are legitimate or not, a combination of HiJackThis and a BartPE boot CD is difficult to beat when dealing with stubborn Malware DLL files.

So far, I have heard more complaints with Norton and McAfee than any other virus checker. Both are very heavy on system resources, especially a combination of Norton Internet Security and Windows Vista. For example, I’ve seen someone with a fairly decent laptop (Core 2 Duo 1.6GHz with 2GB RAM), running Windows Vista Home Premium and Norton Internet Security and it took 5 minutes from powering on the system to the time I could bring up the browser and homepage (Google). Once Norton was taken off and replaced with AVG Free edition, it reduced the boot time to under 2 minutes and the system was noticeably more responsive.
Reply With Quote
  #125 (permalink)  
Old 22nd August 2008, 11:42 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
Default

I use avg free edition along with spybot search and destroy
Reply With Quote
  #126 (permalink)  
Old 23rd August 2008, 08:39 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 11
Default

Nod 32 without a doubt....
Reply With Quote
  #127 (permalink)  
Old 17th September 2008, 08:14 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ballina, Co. Mayo
Posts: 21
Default

There are some new viruses/spyware/malware out there that are really tough to get rid of. WinAntiVir Pro 2008/9, etc is a hoax that seems to be based on the smit fraud. The longer it stays on, the more it tears up the system. At times I can get rid of it manually, but I have found that the Ultimate Boot Disk works great as it has a load of tools that run independantly of the system. On my personal systems, I use Trend though it gets a bit over-protective at times. I install Avast on people's computers that want a free AV. It works well with Vista also.
Reply With Quote
  #128 (permalink)  
Old 20th September 2008, 01:47 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by notech View Post
Norton is a well known Resource Hog and you should remove it IMHO.
If you want to use a paid product,, i'd Recommend Nod32.. I've been using it for years after a bad experience with Norton. ( which doesn't make me biased by the way! )
If you want a free product,, then run with the best free one,, AVG..

tec..
I am not quoting because I think the poster is wrong.. so If he/she takes offence then I appologize in advance.

Heard a story the other day from a buddy who installed NOD and it nuked his system.
Like me this guy is NOT a Noob when it comes to computers. He works and I worked in the Comp industry for years.

Please Excuse the length of the following.;

Norton has gotten some bad press in the past but IMHO they have gotten there act together.
I curently have NIS2008 installed on all of my pcs and have Not had a problem playing games or surfing the web.
All Firewall function work behind the scenes flawlessly.
Now, had you asked a year or too ago I would have told you to stay well clear, but not now.
On the otherhand... Norton 360??? adds little to the more competent Nis version.
360 is for those duped into thinking they really need it.. ie First Time buyers and those sold by in-house staff of computer shops trying to boost their comissions.
Nis is better than 360.
In defense of the rest.... feel free to try all.
Everybody has their own preference and I am not going to dictate what should be purchased or downloaded.

Ending statement.. I use and enjoy using Norton Internet security (works with Vista 32 and 64 Dosen't work with Xp 64), and I use Avg for Xp64, with Zonealarm firewall (Can be tricky to set up but secure).

Comment and responses welcome.
Cheers

Last edited by Osiris_set; 20th September 2008 at 01:52 PM. Reason: mistakes and a few edits for accuraccy
Reply With Quote
  #129 (permalink)  
Old 20th September 2008, 03:23 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ballina, Co. Mayo
Posts: 21
Default More AV talk

I used to like AVG, but have ran into serveral instances where it had a fight with a virus and won the battle, but lost the war. Afterwards, odd things would happen, like Outlook Express wouldn't open, the system would take a long time to boot, etc. I have found nothing that completly stops the WinAntiVirusPro virus, but at least Trend stopped most of it when it tried to jump on my machine from a web site. It only took about 30 minutes to get rid of it completely before I rebooted my machine. Luckily, Norton was installed on a couple of machines I got in recently. It didn't stop the virus, but by showing the scanning of outgoing email, I at least knew what was happening.
Reply With Quote
  #130 (permalink)  
Old 22nd September 2008, 07:30 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5
Default

I think AVG is really good and it's free and life time usage and it's works very well.
Reply With Quote
  #131 (permalink)  
Old 1st November 2008, 02:47 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3
Thumbs up Avira

Greetings,

I'd recommend Avira.

It's free and has a better detection rating then AVG - even better than many commercial products (see AV Comparatives - click on the "Comparatives" link to the left and then the latest available "Online results").

I switched to it from NAV 2000 many years ago, due to the latter being a resource hog.

It's light on resources since it's designed to scan processes as they start up. The paid-for version scans emails - the free one does not, but then it doesn't need to do so, as anyone opening a attachment essentially is running a process, which Avira then scans and catches if it's malicious.

It also has rootkit detection ability and heuristics for malicious behaviour.

I've never been infected with a virus - granted, as someone in the computer industry and who volunteers on security websites, I use quite a few anti-malware applications, many of them free.

Kindest regards,

Dragan Glas
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
antivirus, software


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Advertising

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42